Talent Acquisition · Recruiting Ops

The recruiter agent that does the grunt work

From a hiring manager's brief in Slack to a scored shortlist with screening questions ready: ReAgent drafts the JD, opens the requisition, posts the role, and reviews every applicant — so recruiters spend their hours on judgement, not admin.

The agent
ReAgent
Where it lives
Slack + ATS
Built on
Gantry
Client
CAW · staffing
slack.com / #hiring · reagent
Drop a screenshot of ReAgent in Slack — brief to shortlist

FIG.01 · a role going from brief to shortlist in Slack · drop image / GIF

The challenge

Recruiters spend most of the day on work that isn't recruiting.

For a staffing company, recruiting is the business. Yet hours per role disappear into admin before anyone reaches the part that actually decides a hire. When volume spikes, the admin wins — review gets rushed, good candidates get missed, and the team burns out.

Writing the job description from scratch for every role.
Opening the requisition in the ATS and configuring it.
Posting the same role across multiple platforms, one by one.
Wading through every applicant — résumés, LinkedIn, the no-matches that flood every posting.
Prepping screening questions before each call.
~6 hrs
of admin per role, before screening
300+
applicants flooding a single posting
The solution · how it works

One Slack conversation, the whole pipeline.

ReAgent lives in Slack and works in tandem with the ATS, absorbing the grunt work end to end so the team can focus on screening and closing.

01 · BRIEF
JD + requisition

A manager describes the role; ReAgent drafts the JD and opens the requisition in the ATS.

02 · POST
Every platform

ReAgent posts the role across multiple hiring platforms — no manual re-entry.

03 · REVIEW
Every applicant, scored

Reviews each — résumé and LinkedIn included — eliminates no-matches, scores the rest against the role.

04 · QUESTIONS
Screening, ready

For the candidates worth talking to, ReAgent drafts tailored screening questions.

05 · THE HUMAN PART
The recruiter does what only humans can.

What's left is exactly what should be: screening real prospects and closing the right one. The agent clears the runway; the team spends its judgement on people and offers.

Why it works

Every applicant gets a fair look.

No fatigue, no skipped résumés — consistent review and scoring, so strong people don't slip through in a rush.
Roles go live and produce a ranked, question-ready shortlist far sooner.
Built on Gantry: every step inside the security and audit boundary, integrated with the ATS.
reagent · scored shortlist
live
candidate · A
94
candidate · B
88
candidate · C
82
300+
applicants reviewed / role
< 1 day
brief → live posting
~6 hrs
saved / role on JD, posting & first-pass
Every one
applicant reviewed, LinkedIn included
Scored
shortlists, ranked against the role
1 chat
brief to live posting, in Slack
Under the hood

How ReAgent is wired

A Gantry agent in Slack, integrated with the ATS for requisition creation and candidate management — drafting JDs, posting to platforms, scoring applicants, and generating screening questions, every step inside the audit boundary.

Input
Manager brief
in Slack
Applicants
résumé + LinkedIn
ReAgent on Gantry
draft
JD + req
post
multi-platform
score
rank vs role
screen
draft questions
Output
ATS
requisition · candidates
Scored shortlist
+ screening questions, in Slack
In their words

"Our recruiters were spending their best energy on copy-paste — writing JDs, posting to boards, opening hundreds of résumés. ReAgent took all of it. A role now goes from a Slack message to a scored shortlist with screening questions attached, and the team spends its time on the only things that win a hire."

RS
Ranjana Singh
Head of Recruitment, CAW
This is for you if…

…your recruiters spend more time on admin than on candidates.

Applicant volume swings hard, and you want every applicant reviewed without burning out the team. We don't advise on AI — we build the agent and run it with you.